tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6128144307446432865.post5294472653569374312..comments2023-03-27T00:34:21.392-07:00Comments on The Hackney Hub: Laudian Ceremonial (Part One)The Hackney Hubhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05814256545664986458noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6128144307446432865.post-76130424256019023162015-08-21T21:59:23.009-07:002015-08-21T21:59:23.009-07:00Indeed, Laud was my most potent reason for discoun...Indeed, Laud was my most potent reason for discounting Anglicanism in my days as a Baptist. After reading a (nonconformist, admittedly) synopsis of Laud's actions of cutting out tongues and cutting off ears of non-conformists, I was most certainly repelled by Anglicanism. Give me Bunyan, or the Presbyterians, but certainly not the church of Laud.<br /><br />Now that I am an Anglican, I happily agree with aaytch that Laud was a traitor ... or no Anglican!<br /><br />JayAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6128144307446432865.post-1154934996950974532015-03-19T12:32:32.659-07:002015-03-19T12:32:32.659-07:00If you read again, you will see the article is fro...If you read again, you will see the article is from Augustus Toplady, who most certainly is Anglican. More importantly, the article demonstrates that Laud was cooperating with the Jesuits to inject the English Church with the "sovereign drug of Arminianism." Ironically, that makes Laud a traitor.... or no Anglican himself.Hudsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05511526445868840330noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6128144307446432865.post-61343840796633833772015-03-19T12:11:59.858-07:002015-03-19T12:11:59.858-07:00Spurgeon isn't even an Anglican, so why cite h...Spurgeon isn't even an Anglican, so why cite him?<br /><br />No one was burned under Laud (the last burning for heresy happened under James I), and while the penalties inflicted under Charles I for libel were harsh, it was the Puritans who cut off both Charles' and Archbishop Laud's heads.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12673986996297378544noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6128144307446432865.post-68699092957555465492014-04-17T08:28:06.093-07:002014-04-17T08:28:06.093-07:00Laudianism should first be defined as the boring o...Laudianism should first be defined as the boring of tongues and cutting off of ears for those of a different religious conscience. And these punishments were for the lucky dissenters--burning alive for the less fortunate.<br /><br />Laudianism..what rubbish. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6128144307446432865.post-75254219926854915882012-09-27T09:22:31.414-07:002012-09-27T09:22:31.414-07:00Laudian Treachery, part 1:
http://www.spurgeon.or...Laudian Treachery, part 1:<br /><br />http://www.spurgeon.org/~phil/history/toplady.htmHudsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05511526445868840330noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6128144307446432865.post-39693090375859860852012-03-23T09:49:43.853-07:002012-03-23T09:49:43.853-07:00Robin,
I based my research off of the contemporar...Robin,<br /><br />I based my research off of the contemporary research I could find in JSTOR and EBSCO. The articles refer to Laudianism as a movement, although modern scholarship doubts the role of Laud as the origin of the reforms. While Laudianism wasn't a "popular" movement, it was very influential and did not just affect the King's chapel but nearly all cathedrals and many parish churches. It was not a precursor to Anglo-Catholicism and I'm pretty sure that I made that clear...The Hackney Hubhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05814256545664986458noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6128144307446432865.post-51533400756258034942012-02-16T12:39:13.847-08:002012-02-16T12:39:13.847-08:00Jordan,
I disagree with the classification of
&q...Jordan,<br /><br />I disagree with the classification of <br />"Laudianism" as a movement. Archbishop Laud implemented what he called "Thorough," a campaign of "reforms" intended to reshape the Church of England in accordance with his own ideas. While his "reforms" enjoyed support of a number of individuals highly placed in the English church and state, "Laudianism," which may be a misnomer, never became a popular movement, as was the case with Puritanism. Latter historians particularly Anglo-Catholic ones may characterize "Laudianism" as movement because to do so fits with their own agenda, which is to represent "Laudianism" as the predecessor of the nineteenth century Anglo-Catholic movement. Both nineteenth century and more recent scholars have debunked that notion.Robin G. Jordanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09511384478845569163noreply@blogger.com